<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Inspired Tennis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inspired-tennis.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 04:00:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discho Iontec Tennis String by David Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2011/07/discho-iontec-tennis-string/comment-page-1/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 04:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=789#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>Ouch Dude - Harsh words.  

I make mistakes like everyone, and I&#039;ll give you the point that I should have stated &quot;If you hit a flat ball, poly strings are &lt;em&gt;probably&lt;/em&gt; not for you.&quot;  However...  I stick by my belief...

Co-poly strings are not ideal for flat hitters.  Co-poly strings are, without a doubt, best suited for players that have topspin-producing groundstrokes with fast racquet head speed.  Players with these types of strokes will get the full benefit of co-poly strings...  Incredible spin and action on the ball.

I&#039;m not saying that flat hitters don&#039;t use co-poly strings.  Many do.  However, I feel strongly that co-poly strings are not ideal for flat hitters - especially a full bed of co-poly.  In fact, I&#039;ve had several flat-hitting clients who insisted upon trying co-poly strings (because of their popularity at all levels of the game - especially on Tour), but they ended up hating the way co-poly played for them.  Too stiff and board-like.  Anyway...

You&#039;re certainly entitled to your opinion about co-poly strings and to your opinion about me.  I won&#039;t lose any sleep over either of your opinions.

Take care.

DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch Dude &#8211; Harsh words.  </p>
<p>I make mistakes like everyone, and I&#8217;ll give you the point that I should have stated &#8220;If you hit a flat ball, poly strings are <em>probably</em> not for you.&#8221;  However&#8230;  I stick by my belief&#8230;</p>
<p>Co-poly strings are not ideal for flat hitters.  Co-poly strings are, without a doubt, best suited for players that have topspin-producing groundstrokes with fast racquet head speed.  Players with these types of strokes will get the full benefit of co-poly strings&#8230;  Incredible spin and action on the ball.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that flat hitters don&#8217;t use co-poly strings.  Many do.  However, I feel strongly that co-poly strings are not ideal for flat hitters &#8211; especially a full bed of co-poly.  In fact, I&#8217;ve had several flat-hitting clients who insisted upon trying co-poly strings (because of their popularity at all levels of the game &#8211; especially on Tour), but they ended up hating the way co-poly played for them.  Too stiff and board-like.  Anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re certainly entitled to your opinion about co-poly strings and to your opinion about me.  I won&#8217;t lose any sleep over either of your opinions.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discho Iontec Tennis String by Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2011/07/discho-iontec-tennis-string/comment-page-1/#comment-1949</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 19:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=789#comment-1949</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you hit a flat ball, poly strings are not for you&quot;

Huh??

This guy doesn&#039;t have a clue what he&#039;s talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you hit a flat ball, poly strings are not for you&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh??</p>
<p>This guy doesn&#8217;t have a clue what he&#8217;s talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by David Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1948</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1948</guid>
		<description>Tony - Thanks for the comment.  I have some tennis elbow issues, so I err on the side of caution with regard to cutting out my strings.  I usually cut them out after about eight hours of singles play.  I could probably eek out a couple more hours with them, but I would rather be safe than sorry.  

Hybrid...  It depends.  If you like the way a full bed of co=poly suits your game, then stick with it.  If it is giving you arm problems, then yes...  Consider using a hybrid with a softer multi or gut.  If you want more power and touch/feel, then yes...  Consider using a hybrid with a softer multi or gut.

Hope this helps.  Take care.

DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony &#8211; Thanks for the comment.  I have some tennis elbow issues, so I err on the side of caution with regard to cutting out my strings.  I usually cut them out after about eight hours of singles play.  I could probably eek out a couple more hours with them, but I would rather be safe than sorry.  </p>
<p>Hybrid&#8230;  It depends.  If you like the way a full bed of co=poly suits your game, then stick with it.  If it is giving you arm problems, then yes&#8230;  Consider using a hybrid with a softer multi or gut.  If you want more power and touch/feel, then yes&#8230;  Consider using a hybrid with a softer multi or gut.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.  Take care.</p>
<p>DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>Hey David. I fit most of what you listed. I do lack some head speed, but I was just wondering how often you cut out your strings. I currently use a full bed of co-poly in mid 40&#039;s and I usually cut them out every 2 months. Thing is I feel the strings starting to really die by 1 month and dead by 1.5 months, a board by 2. Also, would you suggest going a hybrid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David. I fit most of what you listed. I do lack some head speed, but I was just wondering how often you cut out your strings. I currently use a full bed of co-poly in mid 40&#8242;s and I usually cut them out every 2 months. Thing is I feel the strings starting to really die by 1 month and dead by 1.5 months, a board by 2. Also, would you suggest going a hybrid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by David Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 02:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>Hey Larry!  Some manufacturers recommend that you string co-poly a certain percentage below what you would for other types of strings.  Some manufacturers don&#039;t make this suggestion.  It is my personal opinion that you should string co-poly at least a few pounds lower than what you would string a mono or multi synthetic gut - or even natural gut.  

To give you some perspective...  Prior to switching to a full bed of co-poly (Luxilon), I was using some high-end multis at 65 lbs.  When I first switched to Lux, I dropped the tension to 62.  From there, I gradually decreased it in 1 pound increments until I finally settled in at 57.  To be honest, I could probably even go a pound or two lower and still love how it plays.

Take care.

DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Larry!  Some manufacturers recommend that you string co-poly a certain percentage below what you would for other types of strings.  Some manufacturers don&#8217;t make this suggestion.  It is my personal opinion that you should string co-poly at least a few pounds lower than what you would string a mono or multi synthetic gut &#8211; or even natural gut.  </p>
<p>To give you some perspective&#8230;  Prior to switching to a full bed of co-poly (Luxilon), I was using some high-end multis at 65 lbs.  When I first switched to Lux, I dropped the tension to 62.  From there, I gradually decreased it in 1 pound increments until I finally settled in at 57.  To be honest, I could probably even go a pound or two lower and still love how it plays.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>David,
I was told to string Luxilon co-poly strings at a 10% lower tension that standard synthetic gut (mono or multifilament).  So if you normally string at 57 lbs., you would string the Luxilon at 52 lbs.  I have done the same tension reduction on Babolat RPM Blast.
Does this hold true as a rule of thumb for all co-poly strings?

Thanks,
Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
I was told to string Luxilon co-poly strings at a 10% lower tension that standard synthetic gut (mono or multifilament).  So if you normally string at 57 lbs., you would string the Luxilon at 52 lbs.  I have done the same tension reduction on Babolat RPM Blast.<br />
Does this hold true as a rule of thumb for all co-poly strings?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Tennis String by David Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/01/free-tennis-string-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=960#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>Stay tuned Joel.  More string give-away contests coming very soon.

DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay tuned Joel.  More string give-away contests coming very soon.</p>
<p>DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by David Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>David Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 03:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>The terms are really synonymous.  For example, some people will call Alu Power a &quot;poly&quot;, and others will call it a &quot;co-poly&quot;.  Co-poly is the more correct term, but poly is the more common term.

I&#039;m glad you&#039;re liking MSV Focus Hex 17.  I have never played it but have strung it for a few clients.  And...  I&#039;m glad you&#039;re elbow is like new. :)

Take care.

DH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The terms are really synonymous.  For example, some people will call Alu Power a &#8220;poly&#8221;, and others will call it a &#8220;co-poly&#8221;.  Co-poly is the more correct term, but poly is the more common term.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re liking MSV Focus Hex 17.  I have never played it but have strung it for a few clients.  And&#8230;  I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re elbow is like new. <img src='http://www.inspired-tennis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>DH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Tennis String by Joel Carrera</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/01/free-tennis-string-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Carrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=960#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>i need new strings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i need new strings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 Ways to Know if Co-Poly Tennis Strings Are for You by Winslow</title>
		<link>http://www.inspired-tennis.com/2012/04/5-ways-to-know-if-co-poly-tennis-strings-are-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Winslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 04:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inspired-tennis.com/?p=989#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>David, great to see a new post.  Can you comment on the differences between poly and co-poly.  Seems like polys were on the market first, why this evolution?

I&#039;m a multifilament guy but am trying MSV Focus Hex 17 right now and am liking it especially from the baseline - just like you mentioned.  I&#039;ve fully recovered from tennis elbow two years ago, no problems with this string as of now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, great to see a new post.  Can you comment on the differences between poly and co-poly.  Seems like polys were on the market first, why this evolution?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a multifilament guy but am trying MSV Focus Hex 17 right now and am liking it especially from the baseline &#8211; just like you mentioned.  I&#8217;ve fully recovered from tennis elbow two years ago, no problems with this string as of now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

